Imposed Restriction in the Canadian Armed Forces

The Influence of Geographic Instability on Well-Being

Abstract

The fall 2022 iteration of the Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) Your Say Survey (YSS) examined experiences with Imposed Restriction (IR) among Regular Force (Reg F) members. Findings revealed that 4.2% of CAF members were on IR, with most serving durations under six months. Common reasons for IR included spouse/partner employment, family stability, housing, and education concerns. A notable 7.4% declined postings to avoid IR, often to preserve family cohesion. Satisfaction with IR policies and benefits is low, with dissatisfaction rates exceeding 60%. A thematic analysis of qualitative comments identified key concerns impacting the well-being of the CAF membership exposed to IR: outdated policies, financial burden, housing challenges, and inadequate knowledge of IR provisions. While some respondents appreciated aspects of IR, most feedback reflected negative perceptions, underscoring a need for policy modernization, enhanced communication, and increased flexibility. Results from the 2024 cohort largely reflected similar findings, and combined offer valuable insights into the effects of IR on member well-being within the CAF. With the recent historic investment in CAF compensation, close attention to the reception of IR benefits going forward is needed.

Keywords: Canadian Armed Forces (CAF), Imposed Restriction (IR), well-being