The Political Economy of Security: A Research and Teaching Agenda

Authors

  • Norrin M. Ripsman Dalhousie University and Concordia University

Abstract

This article criticises the traditional realist distinction between “high politics” (sovereignty and security matters) and “low politics” (economics and other “less important” state activities) on several grounds. First, it ignores the economic underpinnings of military power and national security. Second, it overestimates the independence states have both from the international economy and from domestic political opposition when mobilizing economic resources in support of security objectives. Finally, it glosses over the potential for states to achieve national security objectives in an interdependent world economy by using economic instruments, such as economic sanctions and economic incentives. This article, therefore, makes the case for treating the political economy of national security as a distinct subfield of security studies for both teaching and research purposes. It identifies a unique set of “political economy” issues that have a direct bearing on national security calculations. It reviews both the classical geopolitics literature and a growing literature by contemporary international relations scholars that address these issues in an effort to bridge the chasm between political economy and security. Finally, it suggests avenues of further research to flesh out the conditions under which domestic and international economic factors affect the pursuit of national security.

Author Biography

Norrin M. Ripsman, Dalhousie University and Concordia University

Dr. Ripsman is a visiting Assistant in the Political Science Department at Dalhousie University and Assistant Professor in the Political Science Department at Concordia University.

Downloads

Issue

Section

Articles